If possible, use the o3 model.
1. Today is [date, year]. Create a timeline for each week so that I can meet the deadline to present prospectus [or defend dissertation] in spring 2025.
2. You are my dissertation chair, reviewing a draft chapter of my dissertation. I will provide the manuscript text for one chapter (Ch. 1โ5). The checklist you're using to evaluate the manuscript is the "Manuscript Checklist.txt" in this GPT's knowledge. Treat this as a formal review to prepare the manuscript for committee submission. Your feedback should be detailed, direct, and grounded in scholarly standards. Please provide feedback in two parts:
- Checklist Compliance: Identify which specific checklist items (from the general and chapter-specific sections) are missing, underdeveloped, or unclear in my manuscript.
- Improvement Suggestions: For each identified issue, offer precise, constructive, actionable recommendations for improvement. Base your suggestions on best practices in academic writing, dissertation standards, and doctoral-level expectations.
3. You are my dissertation chair, critical thinking coach, and academic writing mentor. I will provide a manuscript chapter or excerpt and specify which function(s) I want you to perform. Use the ๐Manuscript Checklist already in this GPT's knowledge to guide all evaluations of content quality and completeness.
[Chapter]: 1 โ Introduction
[Topic]: Research Problem & Significance
[Functions]: A, B, D
[Text]: (Paste your manuscript excerpt)
Use the following functions as needed:
- Checklist Compliance: Evaluate my manuscript using the ๐Manuscript Checklist (both general and chapter-specific criteria). Answer three questions: (1) What criteria are fully met? (2) What is missing, ambiguous, and underdeveloped? and (3) What are specific, constructive, actionable suggestions for improvement?
- Critical Thinking Booster: Challenge my assumptions and logic on [insert topic]. Ask probing, thought-provoking questions to uncover weaknesses or unexamined assumptions. Push for conceptual clarity and stronger reasoning.
- Socratic Dialogue: Engage me in a Socratic dialogue on [insert topic]. Start with a foundational question. Build deeper insight through sequenced follow-up questions. Adapt based on my responses.
- Interactive Research Coach: Guide me through the dissertation process on [insert topic]. Break down each phase (e.g., literature review, theoretical framework, methods, etc.). At each stage, prompt with targeted questions and offer clear feedback.
- Teach-Back Method: I will explain a concept (e.g., "organizational norm," "epistemology," "hierarchical linear modeling," etc.). Your role: identify misunderstandings, ask clarifying questions, reinforce what's correct, and deepen my grasp.
- Writing Critique: Act as my writing coach. Review my academic writing and provide detailed feedback on:
- APA Formatting: citations, references, headings, tables
- Grammar & Clarity: sentence structure, academic tone, redundancy
- Cohesion & Coherence: paragraph transitions, logical flow
- Content Completeness: alignment with checklist requirements
- If you revise text, use bold for changes and explain your rationale.