Which is an example of attacking someone’s private life, as seen in mobbing?
A
Shouting at a colleague in public
B
Restricting access to key meetings
C
Mimicking someone’s gait or voice
D
Filing a complaint with HR
Correct Answer: C
A: Incorrect – that is verbal aggression
B: Incorrect – this relates to organizational measures
C: Correct – mocking personal traits targets private life
D: Incorrect – not necessarily harassment or mobbing
Application Questions
Application Q1
Reflect on the definitions of workplace aggression. How will you define and operationalize workplace aggression in your dissertation study?
Application Q2
The Workplace Ostracism Scale uses a 7-point Likert format. How might you adapt this or another measure to fit your study context or population?
Application Q3
Psychological aggression is more prevalent than physical aggression. How might you address psychological aggression in your research design and instrumentation?
Application Q4
The construct of microaggressions has evolved over time. How might your study capture these subtleties without overgeneralizing or misinterpreting intent?
Application Q5
Based on the findings about aggression from the public, how would you design a study that distinguishes between internal (employee-based) and external (public-based) aggression?
Application Q6
Choose one type of aggression (e.g., bullying, exclusion, undermining). How does this construct apply to your research setting?
Application Q7
Workplace aggression includes overlapping constructs. How will you ensure construct clarity and reduce jingle-jangle fallacies in your study?
Application Q8
Review the neurological impacts of verbal insults. How might these findings inform the theoretical framework or practical implications of your dissertation?
Application Q9
Reflect on how your own experiences with leadership, positive or negative, might shape your assumptions about aggression in the workplace.
Application Q10
Ethical leadership had the strongest negative relationship with aggression. How might you incorporate leadership style as a variable in your research?
Application Q11
Consider the meta-synthesis on microaggressions, discrimination, and incivility. How might you justify your choice of one construct over the others?
Application Q12
Based on rational choice theory, aggression may be used to achieve a valued goal. How could you test or challenge this assumption in your study?
Application Q13
How might social comparison processes explain grievances in your field site or participant population?
Application Q14
If you were to measure workplace undermining, what methods or scales would you consider, and why?
Application Q15
Reflect on the critique that the construct of workplace aggression is too broad. How will you justify your specific focus within this broad domain?
Application Q16
Which leadership style(s) would you expect to be most relevant in your dissertation research context, and why?
Application Q17
How could you incorporate physiological or neurological data into your study of workplace aggression, if at all?
Application Q18
Consider the possibility of using observational data to capture subtle slights. What ethical or methodological challenges might arise?
Application Q19
How might you distinguish between intention and impact when studying aggressive behaviors?
Application Q20
How could your research contribute to reducing workplace aggression, either through policy, leadership training, or organizational interventions?