B: Correct – Extremes in relations benefit from task-oriented leadership.
C: Incorrect – Task structure is just one part of situational favorability.
D: Incorrect – Democratic environments aren’t a deciding factor in Fiedler’s model.
Application Questions
Application Q1
Reflecting on your own dissertation topic, identify a potential group or organizational context you are studying. How might contingency theory help you analyze which leadership style would be most effective in that context?
Application Q2
Consider the LPC scale. Describe how you might adapt or apply it to assess your participants’ leadership styles. What challenges might you face?
Application Q3
If your research involves unstructured or creative tasks, how would contingency theory guide your choice of research variables or instruments?
Application Q4
How could you integrate the concept of “leader-member relations” into your conceptual framework? What indicators would you use?
Application Q5
In what ways do leader position power and organizational hierarchy influence leadership effectiveness in your research context?
Application Q6
Identify a situation in your research setting that reflects poor leader-member relations. According to contingency theory, what leadership style would be most effective, and why?
Application Q7
Analyze whether your dissertation setting involves high or low task structure. What leadership implications arise from your analysis?
Application Q8
If your dissertation involves multiple levels of management, how might the concept of distributed leadership interact with contingency theory?
Application Q9
How could contingency theory help explain leadership success or failure in a case study or historical example you're using?
Application Q10
Contingency theory is sometimes criticized for assuming static leadership styles. Do you observe flexibility or fixed styles in your research subjects? How would this affect your theoretical framing?
Application Q11
How might you use contingency theory to design interview or survey questions that examine leadership effectiveness in varying contexts?
Application Q12
Consider your data collection methods. How might they allow you to detect differences in leadership effectiveness across structured and unstructured tasks?
Application Q13
Do you anticipate observing any mismatches between leader style and situational demands in your research setting? What theoretical implications would such mismatches have?
Application Q14
How could contingency theory guide your sampling strategy if your dissertation involves leaders in different organizational environments?
Application Q15
What are the practical implications of contingency theory for training or selecting leaders in your field of study?
Application Q16
Contingency theory includes situational factors (task, relations, power). Which of these do you expect to vary most in your research, and how might that affect your findings?
Application Q17
Are there limitations to applying contingency theory in your context (e.g., cultural factors, hybrid leadership styles)? How might you address or acknowledge these?
Application Q18
Suppose you're studying leadership in crisis situations. How would contingency theory guide your hypothesis development?
Application Q19
If you're using a mixed-methods design, how might contingency theory help you integrate your qualitative and quantitative data?
Application Q20
How could your dissertation contribute to the development or refinement of contingency theory—either by offering support, extending it, or identifying limitations?